Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

ad-creative-intelligence广告创意智力

Agent Skill

ad-creative-intelligence 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

259

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

607

下载量

91
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-creative-intelligence(广告创意智力)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-creative-intelligence
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-creative-intelligence
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-creative-intelligence

简介

广告创意智力通过爬取竞争对手的广告并分析创意模式,寻找新的广告方向和识别市场中的成功案例。

  • 适用于需要了解竞争对手广告策略、寻找新创意角度或审计广告领域的场景。
  • 提供核心原则和具体使用步骤,帮助团队基于证据制定创意策略。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-creative-intelligence。
  • 使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

SKILL.md

Ad Creative Intelligence

Scrape competitor ads from Meta and Google, then analyze creative patterns — hooks, formats, angles, CTAs — to find directions you haven't tried and identify what's resonating in the market.

Core principle: The best ad creative teams don't guess. They start with evidence from what's already working, then differentiate.

When to Use

  • "What ads are my competitors running?"
  • "Find new creative angles for our paid campaigns"
  • "What hooks are working in [our space]?"
  • "I want to audit the ad landscape before we launch"
  • "What format — video, image, carousel — is dominant in our category?"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Competitor names and website domains (e.g., apollo.io, clay.run)
  2. Your own domain (to optionally include for self-audit comparison)
  3. Channels to cover: Meta only, Google only, or both? (default: both)
  4. Time range: active ads only (default) or historical?
  5. What's your product category? (helps with analysis framing)

Phase 1: Scrape Meta Ads

Run meta-ad-scraper for each competitor:

python3 skills/meta-ad-scraper/scripts/scrape_meta_ads.py \
  --domain <competitor_domain> \
  --output json

Collect per ad:

  • Ad copy (headline + body text)
  • Visual description / media type (image, video, carousel)
  • CTA button text
  • Landing page URL
  • Estimated run time (active duration proxy)
  • Platforms (Facebook, Instagram, etc.)

Phase 2: Scrape Google Ads

Run google-ad-scraper for each competitor:

python3 skills/google-ad-scraper/scripts/scrape_google_ads.py \
  --domain <competitor_domain> \
  --output json

Collect per ad:

  • Headline variants (up to 3)
  • Description lines
  • Ad type (search, display, YouTube)
  • Landing page URL

Phase 3: Cluster & Analyze

After collecting all ads, perform structured analysis:

Hook Pattern Clustering

Group all ad headlines/openers by hook type:

Hook TypePatternExample
Fear/LossRisk of missing out or falling behind"Your competitors are already using AI SDRs"
OutcomeDirect result promise"10x your pipeline in 30 days"
QuestionChallenges current assumption"Still doing outbound manually?"
Social proofNames customers or numbers"Join 500+ B2B teams using [product]"
ContrarianChallenges conventional wisdom"Cold email isn't dead. Your copy is."
EmpathyValidates their pain"We know SDR ramp time is brutal"
Product-ledFeature as hook"[Feature] is live — see what's new"

Count how many ads per competitor use each hook type. This reveals their primary messaging strategy.

Format Distribution

FormatMetaGoogle
Static image[N]N/A
Video[N][N]
Carousel[N]N/A
Search textN/A[N]
Display bannerN/A[N]

CTA Taxonomy

List all unique CTAs found. Common patterns:

  • Urgency: "Start free", "Try now", "Get started today"
  • Low-friction: "See how it works", "Watch demo", "Learn more"
  • Outcome: "Book a demo", "Get your free audit", "Calculate your ROI"

Landing Page Analysis

For top-traffic ads (those running longest), note:

  • What angle does the landing page reinforce?
  • Is the LP general or campaign-specific?
  • What's the primary conversion goal?

Phase 4: Gap Analysis & Recommendations

Identify:

  1. Angles nobody is running — Hook types absent from competitor ads = white space
  2. Overcrowded angles — If everyone leads with "save time", avoid it or be more specific
  3. Format opportunities — If no one is running video in your space, it may stand out
  4. Underutilized proof — Are competitors avoiding specific proof points you could own?
  5. CTA patterns to test — What CTAs do the longest-running ads use?

Phase 5: Output Format

# Ad Creative Intelligence Report — [DATE]

## Coverage
- Competitors analyzed: [list]
- Meta ads collected: [N]
- Google ads collected: [N]

---

## Meta Ad Analysis

### Hook Distribution
| Hook Type | [Comp1] | [Comp2] | [Comp3] |
|-----------|---------|---------|---------|
| Fear/Loss | 40% | 10% | 0% |
| Outcome | 30% | 50% | 60% |
...

### Top Performing Ads (Longest Running)
**[Competitor] — [Ad Title/Hook]**
> [Ad copy excerpt]
- Format: [type]
- CTA: [text]
- Running since: [date]
- Why it likely works: [analysis]

---

## Google Ad Analysis

### Headline Patterns
[Top headline structures with examples]

### Most Common CTAs
[ranked list]

---

## Creative Gap Analysis

### Angles Nobody Is Running
1. [Angle] — Why it could work for you: [reasoning]
2. [Angle] — ...

### Overcrowded Angles (Avoid or Differentiate)
- [Angle] — [N] of [N] competitors use this

### Format White Space
- [Format] is not being used by competitors on [platform]

---

## Recommended Creative Experiments

### Experiment 1: [Name]
- Platform: [Meta/Google]
- Format: [type]
- Hook angle: [type]
- Proposed headline: "[headline]"
- Proposed body: "[copy]"
- Why test this: [rationale]

### Experiment 2: ...

Save to clients/<client-name>/intelligence/ad-creative-intel-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.

Cost

ComponentCost
Meta ad scraper (per competitor)~$0.20-0.50 (Apify)
Google ad scraper (per competitor)~$0.20-0.50 (Apify)
Total for 3 competitors~$1-3

Tools Required

  • Apify API tokenAPIFY_API_TOKEN env var
  • Upstream skills: meta-ad-scraper, google-ad-scraper

Trigger Phrases

  • "What ads are [competitor] running?"
  • "Audit the ad landscape for [product category]"
  • "Run ad creative intel for [client]"
  • "Find new paid ad angles we haven't tried"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.17%
按下载量换算32

Claude

33.35%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

18.65%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

10.71%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills