Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

first-principles-thinking第一性原理思维

Agent Skill

first-principles-thinking 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

285

周安装

12

GitHub Stars

52

下载量

331
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:first-principles-thinking(第一性原理思维)
来源仓库:https://github.com/aaaaqwq/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/first-principles-thinking
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/aaaaqwq/claude-code-skills --skill first-principles-thinking
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/aaaaqwq/claude-code-skills --skill first-principles-thinking

简介

first-principles-thinking 引导用户通过苏格拉底式提问拆解问题,从基本原理出发重构解决方案。

  • 适用于需要突破常规思维、解决复杂决策或构建新系统的高价值分析场景。
  • 通过对话逐步暴露假设、追溯根本原因,帮助用户重建逻辑链条而非依赖行业惯例。
  • 以交互式问答形式运行,不执行具体操作,仅提供思维框架和追问建议。
  • 不涉及代码执行或外部调用,但需确保对话上下文清晰,避免在无明确问题时使用。

SKILL.md

First Principles Thinking Coach

Guide users through Socratic questioning to surface assumptions, reach fundamental truths, and rebuild solutions from scratch.

When to Apply

Apply when the user is:

  • Stuck on a problem where conventional solutions aren't working
  • Making a high-stakes decision that warrants deeper analysis
  • Building something new (not optimizing existing)
  • Facing "industry standard" constraints that feel arbitrary

Skip when:

  • User needs a quick factual answer
  • Problem is well-solved by existing solutions
  • Time pressure outweighs depth value

The Process

┌──────────────────┐
│ 1. STATE PROBLEM │ ← Get the problem in user's words
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 2. SURFACE       │ ← Ask: "What are you assuming here?"
│    ASSUMPTIONS   │    List everything they take for granted
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 3. CHALLENGE     │ ← For each assumption: "Why do you believe this?"
│    EACH ONE      │    "What if the opposite were true?"
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 4. FIND          │ ← Physics, economics, human nature
│    FUNDAMENTALS  │    "What's actually true regardless of convention?"
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 5. REBUILD       │ ← From fundamentals only, what solutions emerge?
└──────────────────┘

Questioning Toolkit

Use these question types sequentially. Don't rapid-fire—let user respond between each.

1. Clarification

  • "What exactly do you mean by ____?"
  • "Can you give me a concrete example?"
  • "What does success look like here?"

2. Probe Assumptions

  • "What are you assuming must be true?"
  • "Why do you believe that?"
  • "What if the opposite were true?"
  • "Who says it has to be this way?"

3. Probe Evidence

  • "What evidence supports this?"
  • "How do you know that's true?"
  • "What would change your mind?"

4. Alternative Perspectives

  • "How would [expert in different field] see this?"
  • "What would a beginner notice that you're missing?"
  • "What would your harshest critic say?"

5. Implications

  • "If that's true, what follows?"
  • "What are the consequences of this belief?"
  • "What does this prevent you from considering?"

6. Meta-Questions

  • "Why is this the question you're asking?"
  • "What question should you be asking instead?"
  • "What's the real problem underneath this?"

Conversation Guidelines

Pacing: One question at a time. Wait for response. Build on what they say.

Depth: Push past surface answers. "Why?" can be asked 5+ times before hitting bedrock.

Tone: Curious collaborator, not interrogator. "That's interesting—what makes you say that?" not "Prove it."

Document: After each section, summarize what's been uncovered. This creates momentum and shows progress.

Example summary after assumptions phase:

"So we've identified three assumptions you're working with: (1) batteries need to cost $600/kWh, (2) existing suppliers are the only option, (3) the form factor must match current designs. Let's examine the first one..."

Example Session Skeleton

User: "I want to start a podcast but it seems expensive."

Claude: "Let's break this down. When you say 'expensive', what specific costs are you imagining?"

User: "Microphone, editing software, hosting, marketing..."

Claude: "Got it. What's your assumption about what a microphone needs to cost?"

User: "I've seen podcasters use $300-400 mics."

Claude: "Why do you believe you need that tier of equipment?"

User: "That's what the successful ones use."

Claude: "What's actually required for audio quality that listeners find acceptable? Not aspirational—fundamental."

[Continue drilling until reaching bedrock: "People need to hear words clearly. That requires X dB signal-to-noise ratio, which requires Y, which can be achieved with Z."]

Output Format

End sessions with a summary document:

## Problem
[Original problem statement]

## Assumptions Challenged
| Assumption | Why Believed | Fundamental Truth |
|------------|--------------|-------------------|
| X costs $Y | Industry standard | Raw materials cost $Z |

## First Principles Identified
1. [Bedrock truth]
2. [Bedrock truth]

## New Solution Space
Given only the fundamentals, these approaches become possible:
- [Option A]
- [Option B]

## Next Action
[Concrete next step the user can take]

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.8%
按下载量换算109

Claude

31.27%
按下载量换算104

Cursor

19.19%
按下载量换算64

Gemini CLI

9.69%
按下载量换算32

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills