Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

contract-reviewer合同审查员

Agent Skill

contract-reviewer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

315

周安装

13

GitHub Stars

52

下载量

103
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:contract-reviewer(合同审查员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/aaaaqwq/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/contract-reviewer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/aaaaqwq/claude-code-skills --skill contract-reviewer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/aaaaqwq/claude-code-skills --skill contract-reviewer

简介

用于审查商业合同中的风险、漏洞和不公平条款。

  • 支持 NDA、MSA、SaaS 协议等多种合同类型的结构化风险评估。
  • 提供合规性差距分析和行业标准对比功能。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/aaaaqwq/claude-code-skills --skill contract-reviewer
  • 使用时需提供合同文本,输出结构化风险报告,注意保护敏感信息。

SKILL.md

Contract Reviewer

Review any business contract for risks, gaps, and unfavorable terms. Outputs a structured risk report.

When to Use

  • Reviewing NDAs, MSAs, SaaS agreements, vendor contracts, SOWs
  • Pre-signature risk assessment
  • Comparing contract terms against industry standards
  • Identifying missing protective clauses
  • Compliance gap analysis (GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA references)

How to Use

  1. User provides contract text (paste, file, or URL)
  2. Agent analyzes against the framework below
  3. Outputs structured risk report

Analysis Framework

1. Contract Metadata

Extract and confirm:

  • Parties: Who is bound? Are entities correctly named?
  • Effective date & term: Start, duration, auto-renewal?
  • Governing law & jurisdiction: Which state/country?
  • Contract type: NDA / MSA / SaaS / SOW / Employment / Vendor / Other

2. Financial Terms Review

Flag issues with:

  • Payment terms: Net 30/60/90? Late payment penalties?
  • Price escalation: Annual increases capped? CPI-linked?
  • Hidden fees: Setup, overage, early termination, minimum commitments
  • Currency & tax: Who bears tax obligations?

3. Risk Clauses (RED FLAGS)

Score each 🔴 High / 🟡 Medium / 🟢 Low:

ClauseWhat to Check
Limitation of liabilityIs it capped? Mutual? Carve-outs for IP/data?
IndemnificationOne-sided or mutual? Uncapped exposure?
TerminationCan either party terminate for convenience? Notice period?
Auto-renewalSilent renewal? Opt-out window too short?
IP ownershipWho owns work product? License-back provisions?
Data handlingDPA included? Breach notification timeline? Data return/deletion?
Non-compete / non-solicitScope, duration, geography reasonable?
Force majeureIncluded? Pandemic/cyber covered?
AssignmentCan they assign without consent? Change of control?
Warranty disclaimers"As-is" without recourse? SLA commitments?
ConfidentialityMutual? Duration? Carve-outs? Survival period?
Dispute resolutionArbitration vs litigation? Venue favorable?

4. Missing Clauses Check

Flag if absent:

  • Data Processing Agreement (if personal data involved)
  • SLA with uptime commitments and credits
  • Insurance requirements
  • Audit rights
  • Subcontractor approval rights
  • Escrow provisions (for critical software)
  • Business continuity / disaster recovery obligations
  • Right to terminate for cause (material breach + cure period)

5. Plain Language Issues

  • Ambiguous terms ("reasonable efforts" without definition)
  • Undefined capitalized terms
  • Conflicting clauses (e.g., termination vs auto-renewal)
  • Missing exhibits or schedules referenced but not attached

Output Format

# Contract Review Report

## Summary
- **Contract**: [type] between [Party A] and [Party B]
- **Overall Risk Level**: 🔴/🟡/🟢
- **Top 3 Concerns**: [bullet list]
- **Recommendation**: Sign / Negotiate / Walk Away

## Detailed Findings

### 🔴 High Risk
[numbered list with clause reference, issue, recommendation]

### 🟡 Medium Risk
[numbered list with clause reference, issue, recommendation]

### 🟢 Low Risk / Acceptable
[numbered list noting well-drafted provisions]

## Missing Clauses
[checklist of what should be added]

## Suggested Redlines
[specific language changes recommended, with before/after]

## Next Steps
1. [prioritized action items]

Important Notes

  • This is an AI-assisted review, not legal advice
  • Always have a qualified attorney review before signing
  • Flag jurisdiction-specific requirements the model may miss
  • For regulated industries (healthcare, finance), additional compliance review needed

AfrexAI

Built by AfrexAI — AI agents for business operations. Need a full-time AI legal operations agent? We deploy managed AI agents starting at $1,500/month.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.33%
按下载量换算34

Claude

29.14%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

19.29%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

8.9%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills