Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计未展示

project-development项目开发

Agent Skill

project-development 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

321

周安装

13

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

101
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:project-development(项目开发)
来源仓库:https://github.com/5dlabs/cto
仓库路径:skills/project-development
安装命令:
npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "project-development"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "project-development"

简介

project-development 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "project-development",来源仓库:https://github.com/5dlabs/cto/tree/main/skills/project-development。
  • 使用前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发联网或文件操作。
  • 可结合原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

SKILL.md

Project Development Methodology

Principles for identifying tasks suited to LLM processing, designing effective architectures, and iterating rapidly using agent-assisted development.

Task-Model Fit Recognition

LLM-Suited Tasks

CharacteristicWhy It Fits
Synthesis across sourcesLLMs excel at combining information
Subjective judgment with rubricsGrading, evaluation, classification
Natural language outputHuman-readable text goals
Error toleranceIndividual failures don't break system
Batch processingNo conversational state needed
Domain knowledge in trainingModel has relevant context

LLM-Unsuited Tasks

CharacteristicWhy It Fails
Precise computationMath, counting unreliable
Real-time requirementsLatency too high
Perfect accuracy requirementsHallucination risk
Proprietary data dependenceModel lacks context
Sequential dependenciesHeavy step-by-step coupling
Deterministic output requirementsSame input ≠ identical output

Manual Prototype Step

Before automation, validate with manual test:

  1. Copy one representative input into model interface
  2. Evaluate output quality
  3. This takes minutes, prevents hours of waste

Answers critical questions:

  • Does model have required knowledge?
  • Can it produce needed format?
  • What quality level to expect at scale?
  • What failure modes exist?

Pipeline Architecture

Canonical structure:

acquire → prepare → process → parse → render
  1. Acquire: Fetch raw data (APIs, files, databases)
  2. Prepare: Transform to prompt format
  3. Process: Execute LLM calls (expensive, non-deterministic)
  4. Parse: Extract structured data from outputs
  5. Render: Generate final outputs

Stages 1, 2, 4, 5 are deterministic. Stage 3 is expensive.

File System as State Machine

Each processing unit gets a directory:

data/{id}/
├── raw.json      # acquire complete
├── prompt.md     # prepare complete
├── response.md   # process complete
├── parsed.json   # parse complete

Benefits:

  • Natural idempotency (file existence gates execution)
  • Easy debugging (human-readable state)
  • Simple parallelization (directories independent)
  • Trivial caching (files persist)

Structured Output Design

Effective structure includes:

  1. Section markers for parsing
  2. Format examples showing exact output
  3. Rationale: "I will be parsing this programmatically"
  4. Constrained values (enums, ranges, formats)

Build robust parsers:

  • Use flexible regex patterns
  • Provide sensible defaults for missing sections
  • Log failures instead of crashing

Cost Estimation

Total cost = (items × tokens_per_item × price_per_token) + overhead

For batch processing:

  • Estimate input tokens (prompt + context)
  • Estimate output tokens (typical response)
  • Multiply by item count
  • Add 20-30% buffer for retries

Single vs Multi-Agent

Single-agent works for:

  • Batch processing with independent items
  • Non-interacting items
  • Simpler cost management

Multi-agent works for:

  • Parallel exploration
  • Tasks exceeding single context window
  • Specialized sub-agents improving quality

Primary reason: context isolation, not role anthropomorphization.

Architectural Reduction

Start minimal. Add complexity only when proven necessary.

Vercel d0 case:

  • Before: 17 specialized tools, 80% success, 274s execution
  • After: 2 tools (bash + SQL), 100% success, 77s execution

When reduction wins:

  • Well-documented data layer
  • Sufficient model reasoning capability
  • Specialized tools constraining rather than enabling

Guidelines

  1. Validate task-model fit with manual prototyping first
  2. Structure pipelines as discrete, idempotent, cacheable stages
  3. Use file system for state management
  4. Design prompts for structured, parseable outputs
  5. Start minimal; add complexity only when proven necessary
  6. Estimate costs early and track throughout
  7. Build robust parsers handling LLM output variations
  8. Expect and plan for multiple architectural iterations

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

31.19%
按下载量换算32

windsurf

21.28%
按下载量换算21

trae

16.83%
按下载量换算17

OpenCode

13.21%
按下载量换算13

Codex

7.87%
按下载量换算8

Antigravity

3.24%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills