Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
time series LLM MCP logo
运维云端stdio官方级别未说明来源级核验

time series LLM MCP

MCP Server

TimeSense-MCP是一个基于LLM的时间序列分析服务,提供预处理、特征提取、LLM推理和数值验证功能,适用于性能监控、异常检测和趋势分析等场景。

工具数

4

提示词数

0

GitHub Stars

0

资源数

0
PythonClaude性能监控ClaudeCursor

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

作者 / 组织

andreahaku

提供方

andreahaku

最后核验

2026/5/17 20:20

快速接入

先看主来源和安装命令,再打开仓库或文档;下面只保留这个条目的关键接入事实。

命令预览

pip install -e .

详细介绍

TimeSense MCP服务器

受LLM启发的用于时间序列分析的模型上下文协议(MCP)服务器 TimeSense论文.

概述

TimeSense MCP为Claude Code和Cursor等LLM驱动的工具提供智能时间序列分析功能。它结合了:

  • 时间序列预处理 具有归一化、分割和特征提取功能
  • LLM推理 使用结构化提示的跨时间数据
  • 数值验证 在统计现实中实现LLM输出
  • MCP协议 与AI编码助手无缝集成

主要特点

EvalTS启发的任务类别:

  • 原子理解:极值、趋势、峰值、变化点
  • 分子推理:分割、比较、相对变化
  • 组成任务:异常检测、根本原因分析、全面描述

TimeSense编码方法:

  • 位置嵌入(索引+值对)
  • `` 时间序列数据的标记
  • 长序列的基于摘要的编码

外部时间感验证:

  • 根据统计计算验证LLM输出
  • 提供置信度评分和差异度量
  • 无需模型训练即可捕捉幻觉

建筑

Time Series → Preprocessing → Encoding → LLM Prompt → LLM Response
                    ↓                                        ↓
              Features &                              Verification
              Statistics                              (optional)
                    ↓                                        ↓
                                    Final Analysis

模块:

  • preprocessing.py -归一化、分割、特征提取、异常检测
  • encoder.py -将时间序列转换为具有位置信息的文本(`` 标记)
  • prompts.py -与EvalTS对齐的特定任务提示模板
  • verification.py -根据数字地面实况进行外部验证
  • server.py -MCP服务器公开分析工具

安装

先决条件

  • Python 3.10+
  • pip或uv包管理器

设置

# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/andreahaku/time_series_llm_mcp.git
cd time_series_llm_mcp

# Install dependencies
pip install -e .

# Or with development dependencies
pip install -e ".[dev]"

配置为MCP服务器

添加到您的Claude Code或MCP客户端配置中:

克劳德代码 (~/.config/claude/claude_desktop_config.json):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "timesense": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "src.server"],
      "cwd": "/path/to/time_series_llm_mcp"
    }
  }
}

对于光标 (.cursorrules 或设置):

{
  "mcp": {
    "servers": {
      "timesense": {
        "command": "python -m src.server",
        "cwd": "/path/to/time_series_llm_mcp"
      }
    }
  }
}

用法

MCP工具

1. analyze_time_series

具有自动或手动任务类型选择的通用时间序列分析。

参数:

  • series (列表\[TimeSeriesInput\]):时间序列数据
  • question (str):分析问题
  • task_type (str,可选):任务类型或“自动”
  • verify (bool):启用验证(默认值:true)

例子:

{
  "series": [{
    "name": "cpu_usage",
    "timestamps": ["2025-01-01T00:00:00", "2025-01-01T01:00:00", ...],
    "values": [45.2, 48.1, 52.3, ...]
  }],
  "question": "What is the maximum CPU usage and when did it occur?",
  "task_type": "extreme",
  "verify": true
}

支持的任务类型:

  • extreme -查找最大/最小值
  • spike -检测尖峰和异常
  • trend -识别趋势(增加/减少/稳定)
  • change_point -检测政权更迭
  • segment -分阶段
  • comparison -比较多个系列
  • describe -综合分析
  • anomaly_detection -检测并解释异常情况

2. describe_segments

分段时间序列并描述每个阶段。

参数:

  • series (TimeSeriesInput):要分段的时间序列
  • window_size (int):分段窗口大小(默认值:50)

例子:

{
  "series": {
    "name": "temperature",
    "timestamps": [...],
    "values": [...]
  },
  "window_size": 30
}

3. detect_anomalies

使用可选的自定义规则检测异常。

参数:

  • series (列表\[TimeSeriesInput\]):要分析的时间序列
  • interval (List\[int\],可选):聚焦间隔\[start,end\]
  • anomaly_rules (List\[str\],可选):自定义规则

例子:

{
  "series": [{
    "name": "latency",
    "timestamps": [...],
    "values": [...]
  }],
  "interval": [100, 200],
  "anomaly_rules": [
    "Latency above 100ms is anomalous",
    "Sudden jumps > 20ms indicate issues"
  ]
}

4. compare_series

比较两个时间序列并找出差异。

参数:

  • series_a (TimeSeriesInput):第一系列
  • series_b (TimeSeriesInput):第二系列
  • aspect (str):比较什么(默认:“整体行为”)

例子:

{
  "series_a": {"name": "production", ...},
  "series_b": {"name": "staging", ...},
  "aspect": "latency and throughput"
}

示例工作流

一旦配置为MCP服务器,您就可以直接从AI编码助手使用TimeSense。以下是真实世界的场景:

1.性能监控

场景:调查服务器性能问题

User: I have CPU usage data in monitoring_data.json. What was the peak CPU
      usage today and when did it occur?

Claude Code: [Uses analyze_time_series with task_type="extreme"]

Result: ✓ Peak CPU usage was 94.2% at index 847 (2025-01-17 14:23:00)
        Verification: Confirmed with 100% confidence

2.异常检测

场景:检测应用程序指标中的异常模式

User: Analyze response_times.csv and tell me if there are any anomalous spikes
      in the last hour (indices 3600-7200).

Claude Code: [Uses detect_anomalies with interval=[3600, 7200]]

Result: ## Statistical Detection
        - Spikes detected: 12
        - Indices: [3847, 3891, 4203, 4567, 5012, 5234, 5678, 6012, 6234, 6789, 7001, 7123]

        ## LLM Analysis
        The series shows a cluster of anomalous spikes starting around index 3847.
        These spikes exceed 3 standard deviations above the mean and appear to
        correlate with deployment events. The pattern suggests intermittent service
        degradation rather than sustained issues.

3.部署比较

场景:比较部署前后的指标

User: Compare the latency between before_deploy.json and after_deploy.json.
      Did performance improve or degrade?

Claude Code: [Uses compare_series]

Result: ## Statistical Comparison
        | Metric  | before_deploy | after_deploy | Difference |
        |---------|---------------|--------------|------------|
        | Mean    | 245.3ms       | 189.7ms      | -55.6ms    |
        | Std     | 42.1ms        | 28.3ms       | -13.8ms    |
        | Max     | 892.1ms       | 456.2ms      | -435.9ms   |

        ## LLM Analysis
        Performance significantly improved after deployment:
        - Average latency decreased by 22.7%
        - Variability reduced (lower std deviation)
        - Peak latency cut in half
        - The improvement is consistent across the entire time period

4.趋势分析

场景:了解长期模式

User: What's the overall trend of user_growth.csv over the past 6 months?
      Are there any change points where growth accelerated or slowed?

Claude Code: [Uses analyze_time_series with task_type="auto"
              → infers "trend" and "change_point"]

Result: ## Trend Analysis
        Overall trend: increase
        Confidence: high

        ## Change Points Detected
        - Index 892 (Month 2): Growth rate doubles
        - Index 2401 (Month 4): Plateau begins
        - Index 3567 (Month 5): Growth resumes at moderate pace

        The user base shows three distinct growth phases: initial steady growth,
        followed by viral acceleration in month 2, a saturation period in month 4,
        and renewed moderate growth as new features launched.

5.分段和阶段分析

场景:分解复杂的时间序列行为

User: Segment the stock_prices.csv data and describe each phase.

Claude Code: [Uses describe_segments with window_size=50]

Result: ## Overall Statistics
        - Length: 1440 points (6 months of trading days)
        - Mean: $142.35
        - Range: [$98.20, $187.45]

        ## Segments (15 total)

        ### Segment 1
        - Interval: indices [0, 50]
        - Trend: **increasing**
        - Mean: $105.23, Slope: +0.3214
        - Bullish rally phase with consistent gains

        ### Segment 2
        - Interval: indices [50, 100]
        - Trend: **volatile**
        - Mean: $118.45, Slope: +0.1832
        - High volatility period, earnings uncertainty

        [... segments 3-14 ...]

        ### Segment 15
        - Interval: indices [700, 750]
        - Trend: **flat**
        - Mean: $165.82, Slope: -0.0023
        - Consolidation after peak, sideways movement

6.多系列根本原因分析

场景:调查跨服务的相关故障

User: I have metrics from 5 microservices in services_metrics/. Between
      10:00-11:00 AM, response times spiked across all services. Can you
      identify which service caused the cascade failure?

Claude Code: [Uses analyze_time_series with task_type="anomaly_detection"
              on all 5 series, then correlates timing]

Result: ## Anomaly Detection Results

        ### Service: auth-service
        - Anomaly start: index 600 (10:02 AM)
        - Type: upward spike in latency
        - Severity: 5.2σ above normal

        ### Service: user-service
        - Anomaly start: index 615 (10:05 AM)
        - Type: upward spike
        - Severity: 3.8σ above normal

        ### Service: payment-service
        - Anomaly start: index 618 (10:05 AM)
        ...

        ## Root Cause Analysis
        Based on the temporal sequence, **auth-service** appears to be the root cause:
        1. First to show anomaly (index 600)
        2. Highest severity (5.2σ)
        3. Other services degraded 3-5 minutes later
        4. Propagation chain: auth-service → user-service → payment-service → ...

        Recommendation: Investigate auth-service for issues around 10:02 AM.

7.自定义异常规则

场景:域特定异常检测

User: In temperature_sensors.csv, detect anomalies using these rules:
      - Sensor 1: temp > 75°C is critical
      - Sensor 2: temp  15°C are critical

Claude Code: [Uses detect_anomalies with custom anomaly_rules]

Result: ## Anomaly Detection Results

        ### Sensor 1
        - Anomalies detected: Yes
        - Critical intervals: [234, 289], [567, 612]
        - Type: upward (exceeded 75°C threshold)
        - Max temperature: 82.3°C at index 267
        - Duration: Total 101 minutes above threshold

        ### Sensor 2
        - Anomalies detected: Yes
        - Critical intervals: [1203, 1289]
        - Type: downward (below 10°C)
        - Min temperature: 6.8°C at index 1245
        - Possible cooling system failure

        ### Sensor 3
        - Anomalies detected: Yes
        - Sudden changes: [445, 891, 1567]
        - Index 445: +18.2°C jump in 1 minute
        - Index 891: -16.7°C drop in 1 minute
        - Likely sensor malfunction or physical shock events

快速命令示例

对于编码助手中的简单单行代码:

# Find maximum value
"What's the max value in sales_data.csv?"

# Detect spikes
"Are there any anomalous spikes in error_logs.json?"

# Compare versions
"Compare API latency between v1.2 and v1.3"

# Identify trends
"Is user engagement increasing or decreasing in metrics.csv?"

# Find change points
"When did the traffic pattern change in web_analytics.json?"

# Segment analysis
"Break down stock_prices.csv into distinct phases"

备注:所有示例都透明地使用MCP工具——您不需要知道工具名称或参数,只需描述您想要分析的内容!

TimeSense论文实施

此MCP服务器实现了 TimeSense论文:

我们实施什么

位置编码:每个时间点都包括其绝对索引 ✅ `` 标记:包裹在特殊代币中的时间序列 ✅ EvalTS任务类别:原子、分子和组成任务 ✅ 外部时间感知:通过数值计算进行验证

我们没有实施什么(MVP)

模型训练:通过API使用预先训练的LLM(无自定义微调) ❌ 基于补丁的MLP编码:改用文本表示法 ❌ 内部重建损失:验证是外部的,不是后天习得的 ❌ ChronGen数据生成:可以添加用于测试/评估

设计理念

这是一个 实用MVP 即:

  1. 给你图案 对于时间序列+LLM,无需重新实施整篇论文
  2. 使用外部验证 而不是训练内部重建模块
  3. 专注于有用的任务 (EvalTS子集)而不是全面的基准测试
  4. 开箱即用 通过API调用使用现有LLM

发展

项目结构

time_series_llm_mcp/
├── src/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── server.py              # MCP server
│   ├── preprocessing.py       # Time series preprocessing
│   ├── encoder.py             # TS → text encoding
│   ├── prompts.py             # Task-specific prompts
│   └── verification.py        # Numerical verification
├── examples/
│   └── basic_usage.py         # Usage examples
├── docs/
│   └── 2511.06344v1.pdf       # TimeSense paper
├── CLAUDE.md                  # Claude Code guidance
├── SETUP.md                   # Setup instructions
├── pyproject.toml
└── README.md

运行测试

# Run examples
python examples/basic_usage.py

# Run the server directly
python -m src.server

# With pytest (after implementing tests)
pytest tests/

贡献

欢迎投稿!需要改进的地方:

  • \[\]实际Anthropic API集成(当前使用占位符)
  • \[\]ChronGen合成数据生成器
  • \[\]全面实施EvalTS基准测试
  • \[\]更复杂的变化点检测算法
  • \[\]季节性和趋势分解(STL)
  • \[\]多元异常检测(基于LSTM的隔离林)
  • \[\]多元序列的根本原因分析
  • \[\]流媒体/在线分析模式

参考文献

许可证

MIT许可证-有关详细信息,请参阅许可证文件

引用

如果您使用此作品,请引用TimeSense的原始论文:

@article{zhang2025timesense,
  title={TimeSense: Making Large Language Models Proficient in Time-Series Analysis},
  author={Zhang, Zhirui and Pei, Changhua and Gao, Tianyi and Xie, Zhe and Hao, Yibo and Yu, Zhaoyang and Xu, Longlong and Xiao, Tong and Han, Jing and Pei, Dan},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.06344},
  year={2025}
}

______________________________________________________________________

内置于🤖 通过将TimeSense研究与实际MCP实现相结合

目录标签

目录标签

PythonClaude性能监控时间序列分析本地部署LLM推理异常检测趋势分析

支持客户端

ClaudeCursor

接入字段

传输方式(transport,传输协议)

stdio

鉴权方式(authType,认证方式)

none

工具数量(toolCount,工具数)

4

资源数量(resourceCount,资源数)

0

提示词数量(promptCount,提示词数)

0

权限和风险

stdionone部署方式未说明

接入前请确认传输方式、认证方式和部署位置,并根据实际工具能力限制访问范围。

安装前确认

不要直接授予不必要的文件、网络或账号权限;先核对安装命令和配置内容。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 MCP